Former
 President Goodluck Jonathan has reacted to the allegation that he 
received millions of dollars in bribe to approve the controversial 
Malabu Oil transaction during his tenure. 
Goodluck Jonathan
In a statement by former president's spokesperson, Ikechukwu Eze, 
in Abuja on Tuesday, Goodluck Jonathan has reacted to the allegation 
that he received gratification to approve the controversial Malabu Oil 
transaction during his tenure.
The former president said he did not send businessman Abubakar 
Aliyu or any other person to receive bribe on his behalf during or after
 the negotiation. He also said that he held no secret meeting with 
parties in the transaction at anytime.
Below is the statement in full;
Our attention has been drawn to news reports published mostly by 
online media which suggested through innuendo, rather than factual 
evidence, that former President Goodluck Jonathan received kickbacks in 
the $1.3bn OPL 245 oil block deal involving oil giants ENI and Royal 
Dutch Shell.
With regards to the publication, we wish to make it clear that 
former President Jonathan was not accused, indicted or charged for 
corruptly collecting any monies as kickbacks or bribes from ENI by the 
Italian authorities or any other law enforcement body the world over.
In the first place, we have to categorically state that the 
negotiations and transactions for the oil block deal predate the 
Presidency of Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan which began on 6th May 2010 
and ended on 29th May 2015.
It may interest those promoting this false narrative to know that 
all the documents relating to the transactions, issues and decisions of 
the Federal Government on the Malabo issue, during the Jonathan 
administration, are in the office of the Attorney General of the 
Federation/Minister of Justice.
As President of Nigeria, there is no doubt that Dr. Goodluck 
Jonathan met with executives of all the oil majors operating in Nigeria 
and urged them to, amongst other things, support the growth of the 
Nigerian oil industry by ramping up their investments and comply with 
the Local Content Act that he promoted and signed into law.
We however wish to state, for emphasis, that at no time did the 
former President hold private meetings with representatives of ENI to 
discuss pecuniary issues. All the meetings and discussions former 
President Jonathan had with ENI, other IOCs and some indigenous 
operators were conducted officially, and in the presence of relevant 
Nigerian Government officials and were done in the best interest of the 
country.
We make bold to point out that the former President never sent any 
Abubakar Aliyu, as the innuendoes in the false report suggest, to ENI, 
the IOCs or any indigenous operator to seek favour or collect any 
gratification on his behalf.
We will like to point out for the umpteenth time that whether in 
office or out of office, former President Jonathan does not own any bank
 account, aircraft or real estate outside Nigeria. Anyone with contrary 
information is challenged to publicly publish same.
As the President who signed the Freedom of Information Act into 
law, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan lifted the veil on governance and encouraged 
transparency knowing that evil breeds in secrecy. It is the opinion of 
the former President that journalists and media houses should take 
advantage of this law in their investigative journalism, rather than 
rely on hearsay.
We hope that these clarifications will help guide future reports which should be factual.
Ikechukwu Eze
Media Adviser to Dr. Goodluck Jonathan
(President 2010-2015).

